Comments on: Spicy Doesn’t Necessarily Mean Hot/2019/01/30/spicy-doesnt-necessarily-mean-hot/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=spicy-doesnt-necessarily-mean-hotExplore The World With Us One Country At A TimeFri, 01 Feb 2019 18:34:12 +0000hourly1By: Stella/2019/01/30/spicy-doesnt-necessarily-mean-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-8292Fri, 01 Feb 2019 18:34:12 +0000/?p=38193#comment-8292In reply to LivingTheQLife.

Interesting. Are you sure it was biriani, and that it wasn’t just the rice? Because the suggestion is that biriani originated as a pilav type dish, which means the meat and other ingredients should be incorporated into the rice, not served separately. I’m intrigued now. I’m now wondering if it was just done as a way of keeping the rice suitable for non-meat eaters perhaps. Was it in a hotel?

]]>
By: LivingTheQLife/2019/01/30/spicy-doesnt-necessarily-mean-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-8290Fri, 01 Feb 2019 18:16:40 +0000/?p=38193#comment-8290In reply to Stella.

This is how they served it in India.

]]>
By: Stella/2019/01/30/spicy-doesnt-necessarily-mean-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-8270Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:38:22 +0000/?p=38193#comment-8270Interesting. Because a biriani contains rice in my experience… It’s a rice dish with added meat or vegetables or seafood, rather than a curry like dish on top of rice. Do you normally encounter it as the latter then? I wonder if it’s a question of regional differences (unlikely i would say) or just terminology.

]]>